The psychological causes and societal consequences of authoritarianism – Nature Reviews Psychology

  • Repucci, S. & Slipowitz, A. Freedom in the World 2022: The Global Expansion of Authoritarian Rule (Freedom House, 2022).

  • Choma, B. L. & Hanoch, Y. Cognitive ability and authoritarianism: understanding support for Trump and Clinton. Pers. Individ. Differ. 106, 287–291 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Federico, C. M. & de Zavala, A. G. Collective narcissism and the 2016 US presidential vote. Public Opin. Q. 82, 110–121 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Womick, J., Rothmund, T., Azevedo, F., King, L. A. & Jost, J. T. Group-based dominance and authoritarian aggression predict support for Donald Trump in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 10, 643–652 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).

  • Golec de Zavala, A., Guerra, R. & Simão, C. The relationship between the Brexit vote and individual predictors of prejudice: collective narcissism, right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation. Front. Psychol. 8, 1–14 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Assche, J., Dhont, K. & Pettigrew, T. F. The social-psychological bases of far-right support in Europe and the United States. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29, 385–401 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moghaddam, F. M. Threat to Democracy: The Appeal of Authoritarianism in an Age of Uncertainty (American Psychological Association, 2019).

  • Dunwoody, P. T. & Plane, D. L. The influence of authoritarianism and outgroup threat on political affiliations and support for antidemocratic policies. Peace Conflict J. Peace Psychol. 25, 198–210 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cohrs, J. C., Kämpfe-Hargrave, N. & Riemann, R. Individual differences in ideological attitudes and prejudice: evidence from peer-report data. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 103, 343–361 (2012). This paper shows that peer reports of people’s personalities can predict individual differences in right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cichocka, A., Dhont, K. & Makwana, A. P. On self-love and outgroup hate: opposite effects of narcissism on prejudice via social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Eur. J. Personal. 31, 366–384 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peitz, L., Dhont, K. & Seyd, B. The psychology of supranationalism: its ideological correlates and implications for EU attitudes and post-Brexit preferences. Polit. Psychol. 39, 1305–1322 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hartman, T. K. et al. The authoritarian dynamic during the COVID-19 pandemic: effects on nationalism and anti-immigrant sentiment. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 12, 1274–1285 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Osborne, D., Satherley, N., Little, T. D. & Sibley, C. G. Authoritarianism and social dominance predict annual increases in generalized prejudice. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 12, 1136–1145 (2021). This paper uses ten annual waves of longitudinal data to demonstrate that right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict annual within-person increases in prejudice.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feldman, S. in At the Forefront of Political Psychology: Essays in Honor of John L. Sullivan Ch. 3 (eds Borgida, E., Federico, C. M. & Miller, J. M.) 35–54 (Routledge, 2020).

  • Napier, J. L. & Jost, J. T. The “antidemocratic personality” revisited: a cross-national investigation of working-class authoritarianism. J. Soc. Issues 64, 595–617 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Altemeyer, B. The Authoritarian Specter (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).

  • Altemeyer, B. Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism 1st edn (Jossey-Bass, 1988).

  • Mavor, K. I., Louis, W. R. & Sibley, C. G. A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right-wing authoritarianism: support for a three-factor structure. Personal. Individ. Differ. 48, 28–33 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feldman, S. Enforcing social conformity: a theory of authoritarianism. Polit. Psychol. 24, 41–74 (2003). This paper provides an important counterpoint to the ideologically based view of (right-wing) authoritarianism by suggesting that an extreme preference for social conformity over personal autonomy forms the core of authoritarian views.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nilsson, A. & Jost, J. T. The authoritarian–conservatism nexus. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 34, 148–154 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Costello, T. H. et al. Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 122, 135–170 (2022). This paper provides the most conclusive evidence to date that left-wing authoritarianism exists and presents an accompanying individual difference measure.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duckitt, J. in Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology Ch. 11 (eds Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G.) 177–197 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  • Conway, L. G. III & McFarland, J. D. Do right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism predict election outcomes?: Support for Obama and Trump across two United States presidential elections. Personal. Individ. Differ. 138, 84–87 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Conway, L. G. III, Houck, S. C., Gornick, L. J. & Repke, M. A. Finding the loch ness monster: left-wing authoritarianism in the United States. Polit. Psychol. 39, 1049–1067 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Hiel, A., Duriez, B. & Kossowska, M. The presence of left-wing authoritarianism in Western Europe and its relationship with conservative ideology. Polit. Psychol. 27, 769–793 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. G. in The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice (eds Chris G. S. & Fiona K. B.) 188–221 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).

  • Ho, A. K. et al. The nature of social dominance orientation: theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 109, 1003–1028 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thomsen, L., Green, E. G. T. & Sidanius, J. We will hunt them down: how social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 1455–1464 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Crowson, H. M. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation as mediators of worldview beliefs on attitudes related to the war on terror. Soc. Psychol. 40, 93–103 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duckitt, J. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 33 Ch. 2 (ed. Zanna, M. P.) 41–113 (Academic, 2001). This paper provides the theoretical foundations of the dual process motivational model, laying the groundwork for subsequent work examining the causes and consequences of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.

  • Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I. & Roets, A. The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five‐factor model of personality and social attitudes. Eur. J. Personal. 21, 131–148 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vize, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Collison, K. L. & Miller, J. D. Differences among dark triad components: a meta-analytic investigation. Personal. Disord. 9, 101–111 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duckitt, J. & Fisher, K. The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Polit. Psychol. 24, 199–222 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Perry, R., Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. Dangerous and competitive worldviews: a meta-analysis of their associations with social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. J. Res. Personal. 47, 116–127 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S. & Duckitt, J. Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation over a five-month period. Polit. Psychol. 28, 357–371 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: a longitudinal test during a global recession. J. Soc. Psychol. 153, 448–466 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Osborne, D., Lilly, K. J., Huang, Y. & Sibley, C. G. Community-level diversity decreases right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation by alleviating dangerous and competitive worldviews: multilevel and longitudinal tests of the dual process model. N. Z. J. Psychol. (in the press).

  • Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y. & Malka, A. Reconsidering the link between self-reported personality traits and political preferences. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 115, 1482–1498 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Onraet, E., Dhont, K. & Van Hiel, A. The relationships between internal and external threats and right-wing attitudes: a three-wave longitudinal study. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40, 712–725 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sidanius, J. et al. You’re inferior and not worth our concern: the interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. J. Personal. 81, 313–323 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Vries, R. E., Wesseldijk, L. W., Karinen, A. K., Jern, P. & Tybur, J. M. Relations between HEXACO personality and ideology variables are mostly genetic in nature. Eur. J. Personal. 36, 200–217 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Osborne, D., Satherley, N. & Sibley, C. G. in Oxford Handbook on Behavioral Political Science Ch. 14 (eds Mintz, A. & Terris, L.) (Oxford Univ. Press, 2023).

  • Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. Does openness to experience predict changes in conservatism? A nine-wave longitudinal investigation into the personality roots to ideology. J. Res. Personal. 87, 103979 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bouchard, T. J. & Johnson, W. Keith Hayes’ experience-producing drives: an appreciation and extension. Personal. Individ. Differ. 169, 110082 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dweck, C. S. From needs to goals and representations: foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychol. Rev. 124, 689–719 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Claessens, S., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G. & Atkinson, Q. D. in Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology Ch. 2 (eds Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G.) 22–36 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  • Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G. & Atkinson, Q. D. The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 336–345 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kandler, C., Bell, E. & Riemann, R. The structure and sources of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Eur. J. Personal. 30, 406–420 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ludeke, S., Johnson, W. & Bouchard, T. J. “Obedience to traditional authority:” a heritable factor underlying authoritarianism, conservatism and religiousness. Personal. Individ. Differ. 55, 375–380 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewis, G. J. & Bates, T. C. Common heritable effects underpin concerns over norm maintenance and in-group favoritism: evidence from genetic analyses of right-wing authoritarianism and traditionalism. J. Personal. 82, 297–309 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E. & Herrmann, E. Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: the interdependence hypothesis. Curr. Anthropol. 53, 673–692 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: the role of genetics and adaptation. J. Personal. 58, 17–67 (1990).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Crawford, C. B. & Anderson, J. L. Sociobiology: an environmentalist discipline. Am. Psychol. 44, 1449–1459 (1989).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Buss, D. M. How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4, 359–366 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wolf, M. & McNamara, J. M. On the evolution of personalities via frequency-dependent selection. Am. Nat. 179, 679–692 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson, D. S. Adaptive individual differences within single populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 353, 199–205 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nettle, D. The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. Am. Psychol. 61, 622–631 (2006).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Doorn, G. S., Weissing, F. & Hengeveld, G. The evolution of social dominance II: multi-player models. Behaviour 140, 1333–1358 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Doorn, G. S., Geerten, M. H. & Weissing, F. J. The evolution of social dominance I: two-player models. Behaviour 140, 1305–1332 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dall, S. R. X., Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecol. Lett. 7, 734–739 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gross, M. R., Harvey, P. H., Partridge, L. & Southwood, S. R. Evolution of alternative reproductive strategies: frequency-dependent sexual selection in male bluegill sunfish. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 332, 59–66 (1991).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sibley, C. G. et al. Profiling authoritarian leaders and followers: a model of social dominators and right-wing authoritarians. TPM Test. Psychom. Methodol. Appl. Psychol. 26, 401–417 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Penke, L. in The Evolution of Personality and Individual Differences Ch. 9 (eds Buss, D. M. & Hawley, P. H.) 243–279 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).

  • Penke, L. & Jokela, M. The evolutionary genetics of personality revisited. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 7, 104–109 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Briley, D. A. & Tucker-Drob, E. M. Comparing the developmental genetics of cognition and personality over the life span. J. Personal. 85, 51–64 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zubielevitch, E., Osborne, D., Milojev, P. & Sibley, C. G. Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism across the adult lifespan: an examination of aging and cohort effects. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 124, 544-566 (2023). This paper examines the development of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation across the adult lifespan and demonstrates that right-wing authoritarianism is more sensitive than social dominance orientation to contextual factors.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zubielevitch, E., Cheung, G. W., Sengupta, N. K., Sibley, C. G. & Osborne, D. People and the place: social dominance orientation is reciprocally associated with hierarchy-enhancing occupations over time. J. Manag. 48, 1243–1269 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Haley, H. & Sidanius, J. Person–organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: a social dominance perspective. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 8, 187–203 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lepage, J. et al. Authoritarian attitudes are associated with higher autonomic reactivity to stress and lower recovery. Emotion 22, 526–544 (2022). This paper demonstrates that authoritarianism correlates positively with how strongly people’s autonomic system reacts to stress.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liuzza, M. T. et al. Body odour disgust sensitivity predicts authoritarian attitudes. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 171091 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, B.-P. & Chang, L. The social impact of pathogen threat: how disease salience influences conformity. Personal. Individ. Differ. 53, 50–54 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCourt, K., Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, A. & Keyes, M. Authoritarianism revisited: genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together. Personal. Individ. Differ. 27, 985–1014 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Polderman, T. J. C. et al. Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 702–709 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eaves, L. et al. Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the Virginia 30,000 study of twins and their relatives. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2, 62–80 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Truett, K. R., Eaves, L. J., Meyer, J. M., Heath, A. C. & Martin, N. G. Religion and education as mediators of attitudes: a multivariate analysis. Behav. Genet. 22, 43–62 (1992).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. & Sanford, R. N. The Authoritarian Personality Vol. 1 (Wiley, 1950).

  • Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M. & Duriez, B. The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30, 824–837 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berggren, M., Akrami, N., Bergh, R. & Ekehammar, B. Motivated social cognition and authoritarianism: is it all about closed-mindedness? J. Individ. Differ. 40, 204–212 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J. & Robbins, T. W. Cognitive underpinnings of nationalistic ideology in the context of Brexit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4532–E4540 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol. Bull. 129, 339–375 (2003). This paper identifies the motivational components of ideology and lays the foundations for understanding the central and enduring features of conservatism.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hodson, G. & Busseri, M. A. Bright minds and dark attitudes: lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice through right-wing ideology and low intergroup contact. Psychol. Sci. 23, 187–195 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zmigrod, L., Eisenberg, I. W., Bissett, P. G., Robbins, T. W. & Poldrack, R. A. The cognitive and perceptual correlates of ideological attitudes: a data-driven approach. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 376, 20200424 (2021). This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the cognitive underpinnings of ideology (including authoritarianism and social dominance orientation) using an impressive battery of behaviorally based measures of cognitive processing skills.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. in Perspectives on Authoritarianism Ch. 11 (eds Funke, F., Petzel, T., Cohrs, J. C. & Duckitt, J.) 169–199 (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2016).

  • Perry, R. & Sibley, C. G. Big-five personality prospectively predicts social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 52, 3–8 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Desimoni, M. & Leone, L. Openness to experience, honesty–humility and ideological attitudes: a fine-grained analysis. Personal. Individ. Differ. 59, 116–119 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stenner, K. The Authoritarian Dynamic (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

  • Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., Dhont, K. & Pattyn, S. Internal and external threat in relationship with right-wing attitudes. J. Personal. 81, 233–248 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Onraet, E., van Hiel, A. & Cornelis, I. Threat and right-wing attitudes: a cross-national approach. Polit. Psychol. 34, 791–803 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mirisola, A., Roccato, M., Russo, S., Spagna, G. & Vieno, A. Societal threat to safety, compensatory control, and right-wing authoritarianism. Polit. Psychol. 35, 795–812 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Echebarria-Echabe, A. & Fernández-Guede, E. Effects of terrorism on attitudes and ideological orientation. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 36, 259–265 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fritsche, I., Cohrs, J. C., Kessler, T. & Bauer, J. Global warming is breeding social conflict: the subtle impact of climate change threat on authoritarian tendencies. J. Environ. Psychol. 32, 1–10 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Asbrock, F. & Fritsche, I. Authoritarian reactions to terrorist threat: who is being threatened, the Me or the We? Int. J. Psychol. 48, 35–49 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Golec de Zavala, A., Bierwiaczonek, K., Baran, T., Keenan, O. & Hase, A. The COVID-19 pandemic, authoritarianism, and rejection of sexual dissenters in Poland. Psychol. Sex. Orientat. Gend. Divers. 8, 250–260 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morrison, K. R. & Ybarra, O. The effects of realistic threat and group identification on social dominance orientation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 156–163 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M. & Zakrisson, I. What matters most to prejudice: big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? Eur. J. Personal. 18, 463–482 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B. & Bergh, R. Generalized prejudice: common and specific components. Psychol. Sci. 22, 57–59 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Altemeyer, B. The other “authoritarian personality”. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30, 47–92 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Asbrock, F., Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: a longitudinal test. Eur. J. Personal. 24, 324–340 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bratt, C., Sidanius, J. & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. Shaping the development of prejudice: latent growth modeling of the influence of social dominance orientation on outgroup affect in youth. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 42, 1617–1634 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haase, A., Asbrock, F. & Rohmann, A. Right-wing authoritarianism and majority members’ preferences for minority acculturation. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 50, 827–838 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Crawford, J. T. & Brandt, M. J. Ideological (a)symmetries in prejudice and intergroup bias. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 34, 40–45 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stern, C. & Crawford, J. T. Ideological conflict and prejudice: an adversarial collaboration examining correlates and ideological (a)symmetries. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 12, 42–53 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brandt, M. J. & Crawford, J. T. Worldview conflict and prejudice. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 61, 1–66 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hodson, G. Pushing back against the microaggression pushback in academic psychology: reflections on a concept–creep paradox. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 16, 932–955 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Badaan, V. & Jost, J. T. Conceptual, empirical, and practical problems with the claim that intolerance, prejudice, and discrimination are equivalent on the political left and right. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 34, 229–238 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baron, J. & Jost, J. T. False equivalence: are liberals and conservatives in the United States equally biased. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 14, 292–303 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bergh, R., Akrami, N., Sidanius, J. & Sibley, C. G. Is group membership necessary for understanding generalized prejudice? A re-evaluation of why prejudices are interrelated. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 111, 367–395 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. G. Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. Eur. J. Personal. 21, 113–130 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cantal, C., Milfont, T. L., Wilson, M. S. & Gouveia, V. V. Differential effects of right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on dimensions of generalized prejudice in Brazil. Eur. J. Personal. 29, 17–27 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roets, A., Van Hiel, A. & Dhont, K. Is sexism a gender issue? A motivated social cognition perspective on men’s and women’s sexist attitudes toward own and other gender. Eur. J. Personal. 26, 350–359 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S. & Duckitt, J. Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: the dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33, 160–172 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. G. Right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation differentially moderate intergroup effects on prejudice. Eur. J. Personal. 24, 583–601 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sibley, C. G. et al. A dual process model of attitudes towards immigration: person × residential area effects in a national sample. Polit. Psychol. 34, 553–572 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duckitt, J. Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32, 684–696 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levin, S., Pratto, F., Matthews, M., Sidanius, J. & Kteily, N. A dual process approach to understanding prejudice toward Americans in Lebanon: an extension to intergroup threat perceptions and emotions. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 16, 139–158 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Craig, M. A. & Richeson, J. A. Not in my backyard! Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and support for strict immigration policies at home and abroad. Polit. Psychol. 35, 417–429 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mathew, S. & Boyd, R. Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11375–11380 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clemens, V. et al. Authoritarianism and the transgenerational transmission of corporal punishment. Child. Abuse Negl. 106, 104537 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Depauw, H., Van Hiel, A. & Dierckx, K. The relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and aggression in everyday life. Personal. Individ. Differ. 186, 111333 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Hiel, A. et al. A meta-analytic integration of research on the relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and aggressive tendencies. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 31, 183–221 (2020). This paper presents a meta-analysis of the relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and interpersonal aggression.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henry, P. J., Sidanius, J., Levin, S. & Pratto, F. Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the Middle East and America. Polit. Psychol. 26, 569–584 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hetherington, M. & Suhay, E. Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans’ support for the War on Terror. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 55, 546–560 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McFarland, S. G. On the eve of war: authoritarianism, social dominance, and American students’ attitudes toward attacking Iraq. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31, 360–367 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lindén, M., Björklund, F. & Bäckström, M. How a terror attack affects right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and their relationship to torture attitudes. Scand. J. Psychol. 59, 547–552 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Krause, K. Authoritarianism, social dominance, and contesting human rights in Latin America. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 55, 254–265 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cohrs, J. C., Maes, J., Moschner, B. & Kielmann, S. Determinants of human rights attitudes and behavior: a comparison and integration of psychological perspectives. Polit. Psychol. 28, 441–469 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kossowska, M. et al. Relationships between right-wing authoritarianism, terrorism threat, and attitudes towards restrictions of civil rights: a comparison among four European countries. Br. J. Psychol. 102, 245–259 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McFarland, S. & Mathews, M. Who cares about human rights. Polit. Psychol. 26, 365–385 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Faragó, L., Kende, A. & Krekó, P. Justification of intergroup violence — the role of right-wing authoritarianism and propensity for radical action. Dyn. Asymmetric Confl. 12, 113–128 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Federico, C. M., Weber, C. R., Ergun, D. & Hunt, C. Mapping the connections between politics and morality: the multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuition. Polit. Psychol. 34, 589–610 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Milojev, P. et al. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict different moral signatures. Soc. Justice Res. 27, 149–174 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kugler, M., Jost, J. T. & Noorbaloochi, S. Another look at moral foundations theory: do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions? Soc. Justice Res. 27, 413–431 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vargas-Salfate, S., Liu, J. H. & Gil de Zúñiga, H. Right-wing authoritarianism and national identification: the role of democratic context. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 32, 318–331 (2020). This paper provides a clear test of the impact of country-level variables on the relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and national identification.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Satherley, N., Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. Ideology before party: social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism temporally precede political party support. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 60, 509–523 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Osborne, D., Milojev, P. & Sibley, C. G. Authoritarianism and national identity: examining the longitudinal effects of SDO and RWA on nationalism and patriotism. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 43, 1086–1099 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tilley, B. P. When trauma isn’t traumatic enough: authoritarianism, sex, and religion influence agreement with Alabama’s HB 314 restrictions on traumatic abortion. Soc. Sci. J., 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1949546 (in the press).

  • Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E., Crowson, H. M. & Roets, A. The relationship between right‐wing attitudes and cognitive style: a comparison of self‐report and behavioural measures of rigidity and intolerance of ambiguity. Eur. J. Personal. 30, 523–531 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., Roets, A. & Cornelis, I. The closed mind: ‘experience’ and ‘cognition’ aspects of openness to experience and need for closure as psychological bases for right‐wing attitudes. Eur. J. Personal. 25, 184–197 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De keersmaecker, J. & Roets, A. Is there an ideological asymmetry in the moral approval of spreading misinformation by politicians? Personal. Individ. Differ. 143, 165–169 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sinclair, A. H., Stanley, M. L. & Seli, P. Closed-minded cognition: right-wing authoritarianism is negatively related to belief updating following prediction error. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 27, 1348–1361 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Richey, S. A birther and a truther: the influence of the authoritarian personality on conspiracy beliefs. Polit. Policy 45, 465–485 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wood, M. J. & Gray, D. Right-wing authoritarianism as a predictor of pro-establishment versus anti-establishment conspiracy theories. Personal. Individ. Differ. 138, 163–166 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stanley, S. K. & Wilson, M. S. Meta-analysing the association between social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and attitudes on the environment and climate change. J. Environ. Psychol. 61, 46–56 (2019). This paper provides a meta-analysis of the associations right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation have with environmental attitudes.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Milfont, T., Satherley, N., Osborne, D., Wilson, M. S. & Sibley, C. G. To meat, or not to meat: a longitudinal investigation of transitioning to and from plant-based diets. Appetite 166, 105584 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kerr, J. R. & Wilson, M. S. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 24, 550–567 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Azevedo, F. & Jost, J. T. The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 24, 518–549 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stanley, S. K., Wilson, M. S. & Milfont, T. L. Exploring short-term longitudinal effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on environmentalism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 108, 174–177 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stanley, S. K., Milfont, T. L., Wilson, M. S. & Sibley, C. G. The influence of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism on environmentalism: a five-year cross-lagged analysis. PLoS ONE 14, e0219067 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gleason, A. Totalitarianism: The Inner History of the Cold War (Oxford Univ. Press, 1995).

  • Rokeach, M. The Open and Closed Mind: Investigations into the Nature of Belief Systems and Personality Systems (Basic Books, 1960).

  • McFarland, S. G., Ageyev, V. S. & Abalakina-Paap, M. A. Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 63, 1004–1010 (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Regt, S., Mortelmans, D. & Smits, T. Left-wing authoritarianism is not a myth, but a worrisome reality. Evidence from 13 Eastern European countries. Communist Post-Communist Stud. 44, 299–308 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Federico, C. M. & Malka, A. The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: evidence and implications. Adv. Polit. Psychol. 39, 3–48 (2018). This paper identifies important nuances in the epistemic and existential correlates of (right-wing) political preferences, with particular attention to issue domain and the larger socio-political context.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. Exceptions that prove the rule — using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychol. Bull. 129, 383–393 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Costello, T. H. & Patrick, C. J. Development and initial validation of two brief measures of left-wing authoritarianism: a machine learning approach. J. Personal. Assess. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tz2py (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kempthorne, J. C. & Terrizzi, J. A. The behavioral immune system and conservatism as predictors of disease-avoidant attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personal. Individ. Differ. 178, 110857 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Manson, J. H. Right-wing authoritarianism, left-wing authoritarianism, and pandemic-mitigation authoritarianism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 167, 110251 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peng, Y. Politics of COVID-19 vaccine mandates: left/right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and libertarianism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 194, 111661 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cornelis, I. & Van Hiel, A. The impact of cognitive styles on authoritarianism based conservatism and racism. Basic. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28, 37–50 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johnston, C. D. Authoritarianism, affective polarization, and economic ideology. Adv. Polit. Psychol. 39, 219–238 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dunwoody, P. T. & Funke, F. The aggression–submission–conventionalism scale: testing a new three factor measure of authoritarianism. J. Soc. Polit. Psychol. 4, 571–600 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. Identifying “types” of ideologies and intergroup biases: advancing a person-centred approach to social psychology. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 28, 288–332 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kessler, T. & Cohrs, J. C. The evolution of authoritarian processes: fostering cooperation in large-scale groups. Group Dyn. Theor. Res. Pract. 12, 73–84 (2008). This article was one of the first to suggest that authoritarianism could foster positive societal outcomes.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vilanova, F., Milfont, T. L. & Costa, A. B. A dual process social psychological model of corrupt intention and attitudes toward corrupt people. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 123, 854–883 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roets, A., Au, E. W. M. & Van Hiel, A. Can authoritarianism lead to greater liking of out-groups? The intriguing case of Singapore. Psychol. Sci. 26, 1972–1974 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bilewicz, M., Soral, W., Marchlewska, M. & Winiewski, M. When authoritarians confront prejudice. Differential effects of SDO and RWA on support for hate‐speech prohibition. Polit. Psychol. 38, 87–99 (2017). This paper demonstrates that right-wing authoritarianism can be used to oppose hate speech in contexts where the expression of social biases is counter-normative.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Górska, P. et al. Authoritarians go with the flow: social norms moderate the link between right-wing authoritarianism and outgroup-directed attitudes. Polit. Psychol. 43, 131–152 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Reese, G. When authoritarians protect the earth — authoritarian submission and proenvironmental beliefs: a pilot study in Germany. Ecopsychology 4, 232–236 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clarke, E. J. R., Klas, A. & Dyos, E. The role of ideological attitudes in responses to COVID-19 threat and government restrictions in Australia. Personal. Individ. Differ. 175, 110734 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Passini, S. Songs and flags: concern for COVID-19 and submission to authority. Personal. Individ. Differ. 185, 111251 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bilewicz, M. & Soral, W. The politics of vaccine hesitancy: an ideological dual-process approach. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 13, 1080–1089 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, Y., Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. The gradual move toward gender equality: a 7-year latent growth model of ambivalent sexism. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 10, 335–344 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A. & O’Brien, L. Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 82, 359–378 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Crandall, C. S., Miller, J. M. & White, M. H. Changing norms following the 2016 U.S. presidential election: the Trump effect on prejudice. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 9, 186–192 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Latest news
    Related news